James,
yes, you're right, that's what 'solved' the problem. Tests with about 200,000 records and olb:refresh took up to 3 seconds per dbseek, whereas olb:select(0) and select(1) only take up to 0.2 seconds at most.
But indeed, we are already considering, if it's useful to wait about half a second, if there follows another keystroke, and if not, then do the dbseek.
Gilbert,
as far as I understood not xBrowse was the problem.
Would you be so kind to change the topic.
Your topic is like a statement and someone not reading the whole thread could get the impression that xBrowse is slow.
But my tests do not confirm this statement. xBrowse is indeed a fast browser.
Regards,
Otto
oBrw:Select(0)
oBrw:Select(1)oBrw:GetDC()
oBrw:Paint()
oBrw:ReleaseDC()Gilbert,
Why don't you just use oBrw:Refresh() ?
Antonio,
because oBrw:Refresh() made our search very slow (in network with a big database, when the database is in use at more than one computer simultaneously)
That was the outcome of our search, why xBrowse was slow.
On our testing system, oBrw:Refresh() still takes up to 3 seconds, while oBrw:Paint() takes about 0.1s
