Hi Antonio,
any news for unicode support?
Regards,
Roberto Parisi
Hi Antonio,
any news for unicode support?
Regards,
Roberto Parisi
Antonio, this build have new versions of xharbour and harbour? the problem with harbour large functions is solved? xharbour after 03/09 is stable? iam little confused: i cant use harbour because this problem with large functions, but cant use xharbour last versions too because is not stable. very thanks
Roberto,
We are currently working to unify FWH and FWPPC source code, because FWPPC already uses unicode and our idea is that FWH and FWPPC use the same source code.
So yes, you may expect a FWH unicode version quite soon ![]()
Norberto,
We have not published new Harbour and xHarbour builds because our wish is to promote the use of official and fully stable versions.
So actually, you can download Harbour and xHarbour official versions and use them with FWH, with no problems, except the problems that those Harbour and xHarbour builds may have themselves.
I'll stay tuned.
Many thx,
Roberto Parisi



Antonio Linares wrote:
We have not published new Harbour and xHarbour builds because our wish is to promote the use of official and fully stable versions.
Ruediger,
We have the make files to build FWH for MinGW. We simply haven't focused on this as very few users got interested about it.
If you want them, we can easily create them ![]()
norberto wrote:i cant use harbour because this problem with large functions,
norberto wrote:but cant use xharbour last versions too because is not stable
ukoenig wrote:it seems, the Text-position is calculated from Button - Top or Bottom
and not in relation to the BMP-Position.
It is cleary shown on Buttons with big Height.
There is allways the same Distance from Top or Bottom.
A good compromise could be to move the captions slightly towards the bitmap, still leaving them aligned.
EMG


Sorry, I don't understand. You should avoid attaching such unuseful images and start to build a little PRG showing the problem.
EMG

