FiveTech Support Forums

FiveWin / Harbour / xBase community
Board index FiveWin for Harbour/xHarbour Prototype missing?
Posts: 9020
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 08:17 PM
Re: Prototype missing?
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 08:34 PM

The standard API _parc() accepts two parameter! Harbour choices are wrong and only add confusion to the crystal clear Clipper APIs.

EMG

Posts: 9020
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 08:17 PM
Re: Prototype missing?
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 03:21 PM

Antonio, do you give up? :-)

EMG

Posts: 44158
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 05:47 PM
Re: Prototype missing?
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 06:12 PM

No, never :-)

I have emailed you my proposal for the way to go :-)

regards, saludos

Antonio Linares
www.fivetechsoft.com
Posts: 9020
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 08:17 PM
Re: Prototype missing?
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 07:30 PM

I received (and already answered) the "use mak" suggestion. But here I was referring to the hb_parvc() problem: can we use hb_parc() instead? Why using hb_parvc()? Please reread the thread.

EMG

Posts: 44158
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 05:47 PM
Re: Prototype missing?
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 09:09 AM

Enrico,

You may use a define:

define hb_parvc( x, y ) hb_parc( x, y )

The problem is that Harbour hb_parc() no longer support two parameters

regards, saludos

Antonio Linares
www.fivetechsoft.com
Posts: 9020
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 08:17 PM
Re: Prototype missing?
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 10:12 AM
Antonio Linares wrote:Enrico,

You may use a define:

#define hb_parvc( x, y ) hb_parc( x, y )

The problem is that Harbour hb_parc() no longer support two parameters


The second parameter is the index of the array if the first parameter is an array. I can't believe that Harbour's developers have changed the Clipper API interface!

EMG

Continue the discussion