hi, i try compile harbour from cvs and get the error:
hbpp.exe : missing UNICOWS.DLL
how to solve this?
very thanks
hi, i try compile harbour from cvs and get the error:
hbpp.exe : missing UNICOWS.DLL
how to solve this?
very thanks
Bcc58 bcc6x will have the same problem
bcc55 no error
hi, nothing for this? im only one using bcc58 and try to compile harbour from cvs?
HI, no one using harbour (cvs) + bcc??
eu tive o mesmo problema e ainda nao consegui resolver...
minha maquina é windows 7
estou usando o bcc 582
Luiz, parece que somos os unicos usando bcc582+harbour svn. (seems to be only two using this combination , maybe they using vc or gcc or old versions of harbour). ![]()
Antonio, sorry, the error is harbour (svn - last version) and bcc582.
Antonio, try compile with svn after 04/04/2012.
2012-04-01 16:30 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour syenar.net)
* config/win/mingw.mk
+ solved mingw harbour dll and unicows problem, so now
-shared Harbour executables built using mingw will be able
to run on Win9x, "out of the box".
(has a downside that now separate compile pass is needed
to build objects with -DHB_DYNLIB (like with all the other
C compilers), but I left it enabled anyways to give uniform
support for unicows by default, including the nightly and
official builds.)
* config/win/watcom.mk
* config/win/xcc.mk
* config/win/icc.mk
* config/win/pocc.mk
* config/win/bcc.mk
* config/win/msvc.mk
* restored to link 3rd libs (currently unicows, if available)
to harbour-*.dll with above compilers. These are currently
noops (except for bcc, where it just doesn't work),
they are fundemantally correct, but may require further
C compiler specific mods.
; TODO: problem with bcc harbour-*.dll remains. unicows is present,
specified, but ignored when linking, even though it's not ignored
when contrib dlls are built using similar method. I leave
resolving this problem to bcc users.HI thanks, so last harbour dont work with bcc... changelog =>(except for bcc, where it just doesn't work).
someone from harbour team can solve this or time to change to visual c+ or mingw ?
norberto wrote:someone from harbour team can solve this or time to change to visual c+ or mingw ?
I know harbour its a open source project and we can not demand anything of the contributors, but breaking compatibility would be something wrong? type changed it to a compiler, and others be damned. ![]()