FiveTech Support Forums

FiveWin / Harbour / xBase community
Board index FiveWin for Harbour/xHarbour LetoDB
Posts: 933
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 01:05 PM
LetoDB
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 03:18 PM

Does anyone have a compiled version of LetoDB for xHarbour 1.2.1 / BCC582 (exe and lib)?

I have tried running the make file and get nothing but errors.
Manually edited the files to make sure paths are correct and still no luck.

Thanks,

Jeff Barnes



(FWH 16.11, xHarbour 1.2.3, Bcc730)
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:44 PM
Re: LetoDB
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 10:46 AM
Jeff Barnes wrote:Does anyone have a compiled version of LetoDB for xHarbour 1.2.1 / BCC582 (exe and lib)?

I have tried running the make file and get nothing but errors.
Manually edited the files to make sure paths are correct and still no luck.


Hi Jeff,

I have posted the following message in comp.lang.xharbour:

Hi Jeff,

Letodb compiled with BCC 5.82 is downloadable from:

http://www.mediafire.com/?5q36ng57nni2tic

I just compile it some minutes ago.

Andi

On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:06:48 -0700 (PDT), Jeff Barnes
<jeff@can-soft.net> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Does anyone have a compiled copy of LetoDB they could offer (exe and lib)?
>
>I have tried to compile (xHarbour 1.2.1 and BCC582) but no matter what I try I get errors.
>
>I would like to test out the software but it just won't compile :-)
>
>
>Thanks,
>Jeff
Andi
Posts: 933
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 01:05 PM
Re: LetoDB
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 05:57 PM

Thanks Andi :)

Thanks,

Jeff Barnes



(FWH 16.11, xHarbour 1.2.3, Bcc730)
Posts: 1445
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 02:38 PM
Re: LetoDB
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 10:56 PM

Hello,

And for Harbour 3.1, does anyone have it?

Regards,

Un Saludo

Carlos G.



FiveWin 25.12 + Harbour 3.2.0dev (r2502110321), BCC 7.7 Windows 11 Home

Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:44 PM
Re: LetoDB
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 07:40 AM
FiveWiDi wrote:Hello,

And for Harbour 3.1, does anyone have it?

Regards,


Hello,

This link is Harbour version of letodb:

http://www.mediafire.com/?cw8g8q1rgpcc2a8
Andi
Posts: 1445
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 02:38 PM
Re: LetoDB
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 01:17 PM
andijahja wrote:
FiveWiDi wrote:Hello,

And for Harbour 3.1, does anyone have it?

Regards,


Hello,

This link is Harbour version of letodb:

http://www.mediafire.com/?cw8g8q1rgpcc2a8


Thank you very much Andi, but the link is wrong.

Regards,

Un Saludo

Carlos G.



FiveWin 25.12 + Harbour 3.2.0dev (r2502110321), BCC 7.7 Windows 11 Home

Posts: 1303
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 08:12 AM
Re: LetoDB
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 01:47 PM

Hi,

Just run this command to download latest version from SF:

cvs -d:pserver:anonymous@letodb.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/letodb checkout -r rel-1-mt letodb

And next run the make_compiler you use.

Muchas gracias. Many thanks.



Un saludo, Best regards,



Harbour 3.2.0dev, Borland C++ 5.82 y FWH 13.06 [producción]



Implementando MSVC 2010, FWH64 y ADO.



Abandonando uso xHarbour y SQLRDD.
Posts: 729
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 06:49 PM
Re: LetoDB
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 05:34 PM

Hello Everyone,
The link to download LetoDB, compiled for xHarbour, appears to be broken.
Can any of you please upload it again?

Regards,

George

Posts: 208
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 04:48 PM
Re: LetoDB
Posted: Sat Nov 09, 2013 05:17 PM

I am trying to use LetoDB
When I downloaded LetoDB files there is a folder \binary\lib.xHarbour and inside is RDDLETO.LIB
I thought I can just include this LIB in my xHarbour compile project (and XCC linker) using .XBP file and use it.

Of course I ran LETODB.EXE on my server first

During compilation it finishes with:

xLINK: fatal error: Corrupt library: '.\rddleto.lib'.

( I cannot use BCC or MiniGui or other versions of RDDLETO.LIB which are supplied also)

Is there a version RDDLETO.LIB for xHarbour and XCC and FWH1304 which can be used "out of the box" and no previous compiling and building LIB is needed.
I just need to include RDDLETO.LIB in my project and use it.

Any help appreciated
Thanks
Boris

BTW: or there is some other DBF server available?

Continue the discussion