Warning:
This is not the final version, as there is an issue with regular expressions to be solved.
This is just for test purposes
Antonio, buen dÃa
Hay otra versión de Harbour actualizada para trabajar con Bcc 7.1
Saludos
Estamos a punto de publicar FWH 17.02 y una vez lo hagamos, serÃa el momento adecuado
para publicar versiones actualizadas de Harbour tanto en 32 como en 64 bits
I strongly suggest to drop BCC 7.10 and switch to BCC 7.20.
EMG
Enrico,
why ?
The question should be "why using the old version?". ![]()
EMG
Antonio
Harbour 64 bits es dificil de compilar para bcc 7.2, sin algunos cambios en los makes, y config, ademas de hbmk2.
con xharbour no es tan complicado.
Ahora tu has publicado las versiones de 64 bit de borland tanto de harbour como de xharbour, pero fwh 64 solo incluye lib para harbour u no para xharbour (para borland.)
pudieras incluir las lib de fwh64 para xharbour.
salu2
carlos vargas
Enrico,
I meant what is the real advantage of using 7.2 for FWH users ?
A single change like this one means to provide support to many users, thats why I consider if is it worth the effort
7.1 is working fine. We could wait to bcc 7.5 or 8. There is no hurry to migrate to 7.2
Carlos,
Estamos casi a punto de publicar FWH 17.02
Una vez se publique, nos plantearemos actualizar la versión de Harbour y xHarbour y proporcionar FWH 64 para xHarbour 64 bits
Antonio Linares wrote:Enrico,
I meant what is the real advantage of using 7.2 for FWH users ?
A single change like this one means to provide support to many users, thats why I consider if is it worth the effort
7.1 is working fine. We could wait to bcc 7.5 or 8. There is no hurry to migrate to 7.2