Bitmaps on dialogs are not more visible using FWH 18.01, at least in my applications.
Any ideas?
EMG
Board index Bugs report & fixes / Informe de errores y arreglos Bug in TBitmap [Fixed]
Enrico, you obtain any error?
Cristobal Navarro
Hay dos tipos de personas: las que te hacen perder el tiempo y las que te hacen perder la noción del tiempo
El secreto de la felicidad no está en hacer lo que te gusta, sino en que te guste lo que haces
Hay dos tipos de personas: las que te hacen perder el tiempo y las que te hacen perder la noción del tiempo
El secreto de la felicidad no está en hacer lo que te gusta, sino en que te guste lo que haces
It works again if I comment out
inside bitmap.prg.
Any better solution?
EMG
#define REVD1801inside bitmap.prg.
Any better solution?
EMG
cnavarro wrote:Enrico, you obtain any error?
No, only a blank bitmap.
EMG
How do you call painting your bitmaps?, or you use command for define bitmaps?
Cristobal Navarro
Hay dos tipos de personas: las que te hacen perder el tiempo y las que te hacen perder la noción del tiempo
El secreto de la felicidad no está en hacer lo que te gusta, sino en que te guste lo que haces
Hay dos tipos de personas: las que te hacen perder el tiempo y las que te hacen perder la noción del tiempo
El secreto de la felicidad no está en hacer lo que te gusta, sino en que te guste lo que haces
cnavarro wrote:How do you call painting your bitmaps?, or you use command for define bitmaps?
I'm using REDEFINE BITMAP command.
EMG
Enrico Maria Giordano wrote:It works again if I comment out
#define REVD1801
inside bitmap.prg.
Any better solution?
EMG
And even with the line above commented out, the bitmap is blank if the REDEFINE BITMAP ... TRANSPARENT clause is used.
All of this used to worked perfectly in the previous FWH releases (since decades).
EMG
It works perfectly if bitmap.prg from the previous FWH release is used.
EMG
Mr Enrico
I tried to reproduce your problem but could not. I would be highly thankful if you can provide a small sample to reproduce the problem.
Regards
G. N. Rao.
Hyderabad, India
G. N. Rao.
Hyderabad, India
nageswaragunupudi wrote:Mr Enrico
I tried to reproduce your problem but could not. I would be highly thankful if you can provide a small sample to reproduce the problem.
No, sorry. I can't reproduce the problem with a sample, only in my applications.
EMG
Ok, never mind, my fault, sorry. Case closed.
EMG
The problem (for the posterity) was that I redefined GetObjectType() function that now is used for FW_ReadImage().
EMG
Enrico Maria Giordano wrote:The problem (for the posterity) was that I redefined GetObjectType() function that now is used for FW_ReadImage().
EMG
At first, I thank you for the clarification. I feel greatly relieved that I did not introduce any bug.
At the same time, I am also sorry. We started the convention of prefixing FW_ to all FWH functions not to clash with programmers' own functions inadvertently. But this was a function which we created earlier. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Regards
G. N. Rao.
Hyderabad, India
G. N. Rao.
Hyderabad, India
No problem, my friend.
EMG