I also have a Synology DS218 that I use for the backups. I see that this can also be used as server ?
Is that a option to work with or just keep the DS218 as backup media ?
Excluding some or more options )))
Marc Venken wrote:I also have a Synology DS218 that I use for the backups. I see that this can also be used as server ?
Marc Vanzegbroeck wrote:Marc Venken wrote:I also have a Synology DS218 that I use for the backups. I see that this can also be used as server ?
I have several clients that use a Synology NAS as server.
I have to say that then all are converted to SQL. On a Synology NAS you van install the MariaDB package, and it work very nice with FW
You can also use it with CDX, but that is slower than SQL
Marc Venken wrote:Marc Vanzegbroeck wrote:Marc Venken wrote:I also have a Synology DS218 that I use for the backups. I see that this can also be used as server ?
I have several clients that use a Synology NAS as server.
I have to say that then all are converted to SQL. On a Synology NAS you van install the MariaDB package, and it work very nice with FW
You can also use it with CDX, but that is slower than SQL
But with the NAS, they are using it as a Peer to Peer system I suppose? Not the way like the server solution of Otto ?
Marc, Michel,
From My region
Where do you go for your hardware ?
Ik know : VBC in Bree en Bells (meerdere locaties) of Coolblue
Hello Marc,
Just as a test, we virtualized WINDOWS on a Synology and tested it with RDP.
But the performance is not adequate.
I think then you would need a model of the 3600 series.
Best regards,
Otto
Otto wrote:Hello Marc,
Just as a test, we virtualized WINDOWS on a Synology and tested it with RDP.
But the performance is not adequate.
I think then you would need a model of the 3600 series.
Best regards,
Otto
Marc Vanzegbroeck, may I ask what SQL could bring for such small applications as ours.
I think the lack of the dBase Editor (DBU) alone cannot be substituted.
By the time phpMyAdmin starts, I already have done all the work with DBU.
I am convinced that RDP, DBF and the other formats (xml, doc, xls, jpg, etc. ) and the inclusion of the filesystem of the operating system enable so much that it does not make sense to include an additional layer.
Best regards,
Otto
Otto,
I don't think that sql users are using phpmyadmin a lot now a days.
There is free software like Heidisql that is a great DBU system for SQL.
Marc Venken wrote:Do I look for the windows server software 2019 or 2016 ? Maybe 2019 is overkill ?
I did not see any prices for them, but will look them up today.
Marc,
I would only buy 2019.
Then you are on the pulse of the time.
It's not about customer systems, it's about you.
Best regards,
Otto
Marc,
Source text
I have used HEIDISQL before I used phpmyAdmin.
Mr. Rao then worked on a phpmyAdmin clone based on xBrowse. But there was practically no interest and the project is asleep.
This clone would be a killer app.
But there is nothing better than direct access via dbf.
I'm talking about programs like you and I do.
If you work for a corporation or for foreign bosses, it's a little different.
Best regards,
Otto
